Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Things Are Heating Up

Ok folks, I'm going to get right into it.  We need some input around here for a "discussion" that has been going on all day.  Is the brother-in-law (Brian's brother) a bandwagon jumper?  I will try to provide as much information as possible so everyone can make an informed decision.

  • He had never been to a hockey game prior to about a month ago.
  • He opted out of fantasy hockey at the beginning of the season stating that he didn't like hockey.
  • Told us hockey was boring and he didn't want to hear about it when we told him how well the Capitals were doing all season.
  • After attending his first hockey game, he proceeded to say hockey didn't require any skill and anyone could be a hockey player.
 This whole discussion came about because of a post he put on Facebook about how he was growing a playoff beard and the Capitals better have a good run in the playoffs.  He was told after that, that he was not to call it a playoff beard because he did not follow hockey (or the Capitals) all season and therefore would be a bandwagon jumper.  He proceeded to say that he was not a bandwagon jumper but could not provide a reasonable explanation.  

This is where all you lovely readers come in...we need your two cents!  There has to be an ending to this.  The brother-in-law does not consider himself a bandwagon jumper because "it's not like I was ever against the Caps", as he puts it.  What do you think?  What constitutes a bandwagon jumper in your book?  Please reference Urban Dictionary if you are unsure of the true definition.  Number two fits the brother-in-law just about perfectly.  Leave your thoughts in the comment section and hopefully we can bring this "discussion" to a close.

Now on to more important matters...hockey!  It's game night for the Capitals.  Game four of the series with Montreal.  If the Caps can win this one, they'll take a two game lead going into game five at home on Friday.  Boudreau was not so secretive today about his goalie situation.  It was known early on that Varlamov would be back between the pipes tonight for the Capitals.  It was also known that Carey Price, Montreal's backup goaltender who relieved Jaroslav Halak in Monday's matchup, would be starting for the Canadiens tonight.  Are these wise decisions from each side?  Would you have gone with Varlamov again after his brilliant win on Monday, or given Jose Theodore a shot at playing in his former home?  Does Halak deserve a second chance at home against the Capitals?  In case you're curious about how the coaches view the Varlamov situation The Sky's The Limit.

And now to the beard...it's officially been a week since the blog started and the first picture was taken.  That's all from me tonight...it's game time!  Go Caps!
 

4 comments:

  1. He is a confirmed bandwagon jumper! If you do not start following a team PRIOR to the all-star (olympic) break, you have jumped on the bandwagon! You would also be a bandwagoneer if you start to follow a team the year after they win the Cup. So your brother-in-law MAY have to wait 2 years before he can consider himself a fan. I am pulling for the CAPS this year, but would never consider myself a fan, nor grow a beard for them.
    ALSO: hockey players could play any other sport, but lets see an NBA superstar even skate! I bet Sid the Kid could play an entire NBA game and score!

    Another point is that you have to be a fan during the bad times! ie. I have been a fan of the Oakland Raiders since 1977!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ya Steve, well said. I sure wish I could make articulate uninformed opinions as well as you could!

    Heather, way to miss inform everyone with things I DID NOT SAY such as "the Capitals better have a good run in the playoffs" and you're right, I didn't follow hockey or the caps all season, nor do I claim to be a hockey fan or a caps fan. However, because the caps are my hometown team, I will cheer for them in the playoffs. This situation is similar to me and Brian liking the UVA lacrosse team. Being how we are from Virginia, we like Virginia sports and the surrounding pro-teams like the Redskins. However when we started liking the Cavaliers, they were pretty good. Does that make us bandwagon jumpers? No, it does not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The difference between the hockey and lacrosse situation is that we were lacrosse fans. We had just started playing and became fans. You as you stated are not a hockey fan: "I didn't follow hockey or the caps all season, nor do I claim to be a hockey fan or a caps fan" That is the difference.

    ReplyDelete